Charlie, here are some details around HA options currently: 
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh846246.aspx

Paul, here is some details from the Tech Previews for future features: 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2015/08/19/now-available-system-center-configuration-manager-technical-preview-3.aspx

Daniel Ratliff

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 1:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices

I like the sound of new HA options Jason. Are you able to elaborate on this at 
present?

Cheers
Paul

On 5 Oct 2015, at 18:15, Jason Sandys <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
First, there is no CM 2016. The next version of ConfigMgr have not been branded.

Next, A CAS and/or multiple primary sites have absolutely no part in 
availability or redundancy. Multiple primary sites are about scalability in 
terms of managed client count *only*.

The statement “the secondary sites are just DPs”, makes no sense. Secondary 
sites must also be MPs. If they are just DPs, then they are not secondary sites.

Finally, There are new HA options most likely coming in the next version of 
ConfigMgr so planning now is fairly useless because nothing specific have been 
announced.

J

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 11:47 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices

Nooooooo!

How many clients do you have?

In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients.

What do you expect to see from your new design?

On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out an 
ideal redundancy setup.  At the moment we have one primary and 7 secondary 
sites (the secondary sites are just DPs).  Does anyone have any ideas for best 
practice when it comes to redundancy?

Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers.  Do any 
common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking?

Thanks in advance,
Charlie






The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

Reply via email to