I assume you've all seen this as well?
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20051001212614184&lsrc=osxh
On Oct 6, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Arno S Hautala wrote:
On Thursday, October 06, 2005, at 01:43AM, RLD
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been watching this thread for a bit. I doesn't really matter to
me if there is a terminal executable or not. What bothers me is that
some things still get past LS. i.e. Konfabulator
While nothing is perfect LS is still better than nothing.
That is interesting about Konfab. And you're right about LS being
better than nothing.
What worries me is the false sense of security it might provide to
users. With the Opener example someone might think themselves
protected based on the ObDev response. I haven't tested LS with
Opener specifically, but based on the tests that I have done, that
sense of protection would seem to be dangerous.
-- --
arno s hautala /-\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- --
_______________________________________________
Littlesnitch-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://at.obdev.at/mailman/listinfo/littlesnitch-talk
_______________________________________________
Littlesnitch-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://at.obdev.at/mailman/listinfo/littlesnitch-talk
