I think it should be implemented as an instrument tab! What is different about tone stacking and eq, aren't they both effects? Also, it can't possibly take up so much (if any) RAM... if you removed the Func tab for the instrument plugins, would you even manage to measure the saved RAM?
Tres Finocchiaro wrote > I think in principal, the idea of a per-track EQ is noble and warranted, > but it would have to be fit into the GUI properly. Currently, the effect > plugins are added manually and the software is designed to run with or > without them. Once we make this hypothetical "EQ" button, the LADSPA > effect that it uses becomes a much more important build dependency. > Furthermore, our existing LADSPA GUI could probably use a bit of an > overhaul for items such as a graphical EQ. Replacing the knobs with > responsive mixer-style sliders would be much more useful IMO. > > Assuming this happens, the next issue is deciding which effects are good > enough to warrant their own button. For example, for some compressors and > limiters would be much more useful. HPFs and LPFs are tremendously useful > too. It's hard to justify an EQ button unless it is something that is so > commonly added to each track that it would be of tremendous use to our > users. I rarely use the EQ so I would fall into the category of users > that > wouldn't benefit from this. > > The last issue is performance. I mention this last because I truly > believe > this is more properly the ILLUSION that every track has an EQ. To prevent > breaking our current flow, we'd have to have a macro which this EQ is > attached to which only adds it if its used. Currently we use toggle > buttons for this stuff, but to do this properly for EQ, we should look to > see if any knobs (or sliders) are in a non-zero position. I'm not sure if > our current load/unload process with LADSPAs supports such a thing, but > with enough coding and determination I'm certain this could be achieved. > > -Tres > > - > Tres.Finocchiaro@ -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/mixer-EQ-default-on-each-channel-tp10471p10476.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
