diiz wrote > a fixed EQ for every channel is already adding to the CPU load
Here you get close to the answer i was looking for Am i to understand this, as having /default EQ on each FM-mixer-channel/ will take /more CPU/ that adding a 10band-ladspa-EQ manually to every channel in a project? Or to cut the chase: Could fixed /good quality/ EQs be /more CPU saving/ than manual-inserted (My favorite is Nyquist, And it looks very CPU friendly -btw) I diddent start this thread for yet another debate of philosofi in free-ware and anvanced science :P (we have enough of those..allready:) I /Only/ wanted to know if there was CPU to be saved (ram is irrelevant i think) -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/mixer-EQ-default-on-each-channel-tp10471p10483.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
