I waited till I had read the book (at least, partly), and I would say this
is a good book.
Do I have suggestions/comments to improve it? Certainly! But then
regardless of the existing perfection level, any book can be taken to new
heights. (Personally speaking, I'd love to get more feedback on how to
improve the LMMS User Manual.)
The authors' approaches vary, and any reader has to browse the book first
to verify whether it fits his style, and current needs. But that cannot be
sufficient ground to call it trash.
In general, Packt publishes many good books, at par with books from the
other publishers.
As regards the business tactics, I guess Packt contacts competent people
who can write or review books based on their contribution in a project.
While self-publication business like Lulu facilitate people with creative
urge, Packt makes active effort to draw out and encourage such people.
Personally I find Packt's approach more positive, despite the obvious risks.
The first Harry Potter book was rejected by 12 publishers, none of who had
gone to seek her work. Contrast that with Packt's approach.
In the end, who will spawn new exciting writers, at his own risk?
-Narayan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
BUILD Helping you discover the best ways to construct your parallel projects.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Lmms-users mailing list
Lmms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users
