Please let me know if http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite <http://wiki.apache.org/logging/ManagingTheWebSite> doesn’t have the answers you are looking for.
Ralph > On Jun 22, 2016, at 8:15 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com > <mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com > <mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Monday, 13 June 2016, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com > <mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com>> wrote: > In spite of the fact that Log4j 2 has a very compelling story in terms of > feature set and performance, I get the impression that adoption is quite > slow. I could be wrong, but how many open source projects use Log4j 2? Or > even how many Apache projects? > > I propose we try to generate some ideas about what we can do to increase our > uptake. Some things I've been thinking about: > > * Rewrite the Wikipedia page on Log4j <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log4j>. > It's mostly about Log4j 1.2 and mentions Log4j 2 at the bottom in a footnote. > That needs to be the other way around in my opinion. The Wikipedia Java > logging framework <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_logging_framework> page > is even worse. > * The Apache Logging site <https://logging.apache.org/> has no explicit > mention that Log4j 1 is EOL. > * Only the top page on the Log4j 1 site > <https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/> mentions that the project is EOL, but > it does so in two modest sentences that don't visually stick out and are > easily ignored. At the very least the download page needs a mention of the > EOL and a link to the Log4j 2 project, but it may be good to have a > notification on every page. > > How can I update the Log4j 1 site and the Apache Logging site? > Seriously, is there a release procedure to follow here or should I just ssh > into the logging.apache.org <http://logging.apache.org/> server and modify > the HTML? > > I thought all sites where done through SVN these days and a CMS, like Apache > Commons does: https://commons.apache.org/site-publish.html > <https://commons.apache.org/site-publish.html> > > Gary > > > > > * Can we get other people involved in evangelizing log4j 2? It would be great > if we can make more people enthusiastic so they write blog posts or tutorials > etc about Log4j 2. > * How can we incentivise people to convert their project to Log4j 2? Maybe > start a page on Projects Using Log4j 2 and mention people who did the > conversion by name? Or some other way? > > Thoughts? > > Remko > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com> | > ggreg...@apache.org <mailto:ggreg...@apache.org> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
