Random guesstimate for a complete port, including tests (what about docs):
6 man-months. You can shorten things up by reducing appenders and
configuration formats.


On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:

> Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side.  I have already
> had some email exchanges with the log4net mailing list regarding porting
> log4j2 to .NET.  My suggestion was that the apache logging framework be a
> single architecture design which is platform agnostic and then teams which
> port to the different platforms.  It seems log4net was a port of log4j and
> may be going off in its own direction from that initial port.  My viewpoint
> is that's a bad idea as one of the benefits I saw was that log4net was
> similar to log4j2 and we're looking for logging frameworks for our
> enterprise.  We have applications on both Windows/.NET and Linux/Java so
> having a logging framework for Windows/.NET which is similar to a logging
> framework for Linux/Java was a big plus.
> While I have no doubt the effort to port log4j2 to .NET is considerable,
> it would be a port and thus I'm not spending time figuring out design and
> algorithms.  Would anyone want to venture a guess at what that effort might
> be?
> Thanks,
> Nick

E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

JUnit in Action, Second Edition

Spring Batch in Action
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to