I'm suggesting the use of Gitter as a user support channel, not for discussing development. I prefer the mailing lists and jira for that anyways (besides needing to record it there in the first place).
On 25 July 2017 at 10:33, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also recall that our actual use of off-ML media should be limited to make > sure ALL decisions happen on the ML. > > Gary > > On Jul 25, 2017 02:19, "Mikael Ståldal" <mi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I would prefer if we could chose one or the other, and not have both at > > the same time. > > > > > > On 2017-07-24 18:46, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > >> This link was posted on another mailing list recently in criticism of > >> Slack: https://bitquabit.com/post/i-hate-slack-and-you-should-too/ > >> > >> On 18 July 2017 at 09:12, Chandra <chandra.tungathur...@rwth-aachen.de> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Having used both paid and free service (of slack), I’d say the paid > >>> service makes a lot of sense for corporates. > >>> a public forum like this I believe a free tier would suffice — unless > we > >>> are looking for an option of having >10k messages for searching + >5gb > of > >>> storage [1]. This is just my opinion, but people think otherwise and I > >>> believe some-biased opinions on Flock too[2]. > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> > >>> Chandra > >>> [1] https://dev-s.slack.com/pricing > >>> [2] https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of- > Gitter-vs-Slack > >>> > >>> On 18 Jul 2017, 7:29 PM +0530, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com>, wrote: > >>> > >>>> what's the diff between gitter and hipchat? > >>>> > >>>> Google search seems to maybe be saying hipchat is better for many. > >>>> > >>>> We have already Hipchat available, I think. (We've added it to our > >>>> > >>> project, > >>> > >>>> Apache UIMA). > >>>> > >>>> -Marshall Schor > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 7/17/2017 10:20 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Gitter is public. And Slack is a paid service (free version has a lot > >>>>> > >>>> of > >>> > >>>> limits), so it's not very feasible for public chats without someone > >>>>> > >>>> funding > >>> > >>>> it. Gitter, however, is free for all GitHub projects (and Gitlab too I > >>>>> think?) and is even open source now that Gitlab owns them. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 17 July 2017 at 21:13, Tungathurthi, Chandra Kiran Bharadwaj < > >>>>> chandra.tungathur...@rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey actually, a slack channel would fit right in. Any specific > >>>>>> > >>>>> reason to > >>> > >>>> choose gitter over slack ? @matt > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thanks & regards, > >>>>>> Chandra > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Gary Gregory > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08 > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel? > >>>>>> To: Log4J Users List > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as long as we make sure to > >>>>>> document any and all decisions on the ML, it could be OK. Gary On > >>>>>> > >>>>> Mon, Jul > >>> > >>>> 17, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > >>>>>> > >>>>> https://gitter.im/apache/home > >>> > >>>> We can request a log4j Gitter channel for realtime chat. This > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> could be > >>> > >>>> handy for quick questions and other things that waiting on Stack > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Overflow > >>> > >>>> or mailing list posts isn't as appropriate for. > > This would be > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> very > >>> > >>>> different from the ASF Slack as it is open to everyone. > > Also, I > >>>>>> > >>>>> find > >>> > >>>> chat rooms a bit easier to reply to while at work than > browsing > >>>>>> > >>>>> Stack > >>> > >>>> Overflow. ;) > > -- > Matt Sicker > >>>>>> > >>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org > > > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
