SO is great as a user forum for questions. Remko has been doing an awesome job 
of answering questions there for quite some time. I try to also when time 
permits. But it is not a great place for discussions.

Ralph

> On Jul 25, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> SO or Gitter being more popular for questions probably depends on the scope
> of the question and the individual project. I suppose SO is probably
> sufficient for now, though I should start lurking there again.
> 
> On 25 July 2017 at 13:56, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Isn't Stack Overflow more popular for that? I don't want to look in many
>> places to help people. I do not think we should dilute... I have the user
>> ML I read, and SO, sometimes... I am not fond of have yet a THIRD place to
>> possible monitor...
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm suggesting the use of Gitter as a user support channel, not for
>>> discussing development. I prefer the mailing lists and jira for that
>>> anyways (besides needing to record it there in the first place).
>>> 
>>> On 25 July 2017 at 10:33, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Also recall that our actual use of off-ML media should be limited to
>> make
>>>> sure ALL decisions happen on the ML.
>>>> 
>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 25, 2017 02:19, "Mikael Ståldal" <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I would prefer if we could chose one or the other, and not have both
>> at
>>>>> the same time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2017-07-24 18:46, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This link was posted on another mailing list recently in criticism
>> of
>>>>>> Slack: https://bitquabit.com/post/i-hate-slack-and-you-should-too/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18 July 2017 at 09:12, Chandra <chandra.tungathurthi@rwth-
>>> aachen.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Having used both paid and free service (of slack), I’d say the paid
>>>>>>> service makes a lot of sense for corporates.
>>>>>>> a public forum like this I believe a free tier would suffice —
>> unless
>>>> we
>>>>>>> are looking for an option of having >10k messages for searching +
>>>> 5gb
>>>> of
>>>>>>> storage [1]. This is just my opinion, but people think otherwise
>> and
>>> I
>>>>>>> believe some-biased opinions on Flock too[2].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Chandra
>>>>>>> [1] https://dev-s.slack.com/pricing
>>>>>>> [2] https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-
>>>> Gitter-vs-Slack
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 18 Jul 2017, 7:29 PM +0530, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com>,
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> what's the diff between gitter and hipchat?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Google search seems to maybe be saying hipchat is better for many.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We have already Hipchat available, I think. (We've added it to our
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> project,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Apache UIMA).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Marshall Schor
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 7/17/2017 10:20 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Gitter is public. And Slack is a paid service (free version has a
>>> lot
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> limits), so it's not very feasible for public chats without
>> someone
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> funding
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> it. Gitter, however, is free for all GitHub projects (and Gitlab
>>> too I
>>>>>>>>> think?) and is even open source now that Gitlab owns them.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 17 July 2017 at 21:13, Tungathurthi, Chandra Kiran Bharadwaj <
>>>>>>>>> chandra.tungathur...@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hey actually, a slack channel would fit right in. Any specific
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> reason to
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> choose gitter over slack ? @matt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> thanks & regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Chandra
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From: Gary Gregory
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?
>>>>>>>>>> To: Log4J Users List
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as long as we make sure
>> to
>>>>>>>>>> document any and all decisions on the ML, it could be OK. Gary
>> On
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Mon, Jul
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 17, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: >
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://gitter.im/apache/home
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We can request a log4j Gitter channel for realtime chat. This
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> could be
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> handy for quick questions and other things that waiting on Stack
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Overflow
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> or mailing list posts isn't as appropriate for. > > This would be
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> different from the ASF Slack as it is open to everyone. > > Also,
>> I
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> chat rooms a bit easier to reply to while at work than > browsing
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Stack
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Overflow. ;) > > -- > Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to