On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 10:35:45AM +0000, Steve Mynott wrote: > > I suspect things like SMP probably still work better. And if I were > > on call supporting a server I would probably still trust a Sparc > > running Solaris over some dodgy PC desktop with Redhat stuck on it by > > a hobbyist who has never used another UNIX. > > Multi processor Solaris runs rings around any of the free Unixes. > They've had kernel threads for nearly 10 years, and it's very optimized. > > I suspect that SGIs IRIX is equally good, but I have no experience of > that to speak from. > Tru64 from Compaq isn't too shabby either... however they are expensive... probably get the same power to cost ratio with clustered Linux boxes on Intel!! Andy
- Sun's Perl was Re: Application servers and e-commerce pla... Steve Mynott
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application servers and e-com... Robin Houston
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application servers and e... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application servers a... Greg Cope
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application serve... David Cantrell
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application servers a... Steve Mynott
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application serve... Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application ... Andy Williams
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application ... Paul Makepeace
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application serve... Greg Cope
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application ... Robert Shiels
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application serve... Michael Stevens
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Application ... Greg Cope
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Applicat... Michael Stevens
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Appl... Struan Donald
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Appl... Michael Stevens
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Appl... Struan Donald
- Re: Sun's Perl was Re: Appl... Michael Stevens
