Greg McCarroll wrote: > sure it makes sense, but it still is CiP and trust me this isn't > the only bit of CiP in here and much kudos to Paul for it ;-) I'm unsure what CiP is, but if it has anything to do with gnarliness, I know that Paul wrote a >1k regexp to parse XML correctly. It only fails one test from a real XML parsing package, and he tracked that to the limitations of the new RE stuff in 5.6.0. That dropped my jaw. Nat
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Robin Houston
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Simon Wistow
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Simon Wistow
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Robin Houston
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Mark Fowler
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Greg McCarroll
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Greg McCarroll
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC pmh
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Leon Brocard
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC pmh
- Re: Perl Auto-RPC Greg McCarroll