Greg McCarroll wrote:
> sure it makes sense, but it still is CiP and trust me this isn't
> the only bit of CiP in here and much kudos to Paul for it ;-)

I'm unsure what CiP is, but if it has anything to do with gnarliness,
I know that Paul wrote a >1k regexp to parse XML correctly.  It only
fails one test from a real XML parsing package, and he tracked that
to the limitations of the new RE stuff in 5.6.0.

That dropped my jaw.

Nat

Reply via email to