On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 7:34 AM Stephan Wenderlich via lpi-examdev < [email protected]> wrote:
> I never had any issues with them and stating that LPI deals with the > devil is pure bullshit. > If you have any problems than contact pearson... > Speaking 100% as a candidate of *another* certification program, in the OP's defense, Pearson-Vue handled my MCSA Upgrade exam rather poorly. E.g., the testing center was closed, but kept reporting itself as open, so Pearson-Vue considered me as 'skipping' the exam. Back in 2009, I also had issues with an 83 series -- performance-based -- Microsoft exam, which were short-lived. I.e., they used Novell-SuSE's practicum-based engine, which was Linux-based, VNC for interaction and Samba Winbindd for authentication, and a lot of hacks that just didn't work. Even Prometric handled that poorly too. I know Microsoft got a lot of complaints in both cases, and they contacted me in both cases, but they never resolved it. And Microsoft is a much bigger 'gorilla' than LPI too. Someone once stated that Pearson-Vue is like the Ticketmaster of computer-based testing (CBT). I wouldn't go that far. But they could improve some customer service aspects. But in their defense, Prometric also had its issues too. We're just a $150-300 exam taker. It doesn't scale for their customer service to be involved. So I understand that too. Again, speaking 100% as a candidate of *another* certification program. -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith E-mail: b.j.smith at ieee.org or me at bjsmith.me
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
