I think the current on-line solution provided by LPI works very well for most people. The current provider do have some onboarding issues (which I have encountered in other unrelated certification exams), but once you get pass that, the user experience is comparable to that of the testing center.
Now to comment on the couple of other things: - A browser-based proctoring tool, as opposed to a separate dedicated app, is probably a best option if the demand for taking the exam in Linux is there, since all it is required is a plugin for the browser. PSI uses that with the Linux Foundation exams. That said, the plugin may be browser specific, which will make some people unhappy if they want to use a specific browser for privacy reasons. - Having recently taken the Red Hat remote exam, I don’t recommend that approach, since 1) The support and development effort is likely to be expensive, cost of which will have to be reflected in the exam price 2) the work for the test taker to get the environment ready is going to be a pain (you only need to look at the RH forums to see people running into issues just trying to boot the USB). > On Apr 16, 2021, at 3:31 PM, Bryan Smith via lpi-examdev > <[email protected]> wrote: > > To turn this back to LPI, and be constructive ... > > What are people looking for in an on-line certification proctoring solution? > List everything you can think of. > > - bjs > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
