I'll defer to Kara. Kara?
If memory serves, someone (maybe it was you) mentioned during the first go
around that they couldn't contribute items. I checked with Scott Murray and
there was no such restriction. I think the individual had confused a
different issue.
I believe you do need to transfer copyright on the items you write to LPI
and keep them secret, so maybe that knocks out some folks who might have
existing items that they use for some purpose like training assessment or
class-room situations.
But this is more a policy issue than I can speak to authoritatively. I can
say that unless there is some compelling reason why someone cannot
particpate, I would welcome everyone's help!
-Alan
--
Alan D. Mead, Ph.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+217-344-2698 / fax: +217-344-9066
Nobody made a greater mistake than he who
did nothing because he could only do a little.
--Edmund Burke / Linux + LPI = world domination
----- Original Message -----
From: Les Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: It's that time again... Job Analysis Survey
:
: Alan Mead wrote:
:
: >>
: Would you be willing to help us create content
: for the exams? After the job analysis, we will write test objectives and
: then write items to those objectives. Your help (and that of others) at
: those points will really increase the quality of the exam.
: <<
:
: Alan, are there any restrictions on who can submit questions? Last time
: around, I didn't submit any as I thought there was some restriction on
: course developers, authors or instructors being involved in the
development
: process.
:
: Can you clarify, please?
:
: Best,
:
: --- Les [http://www.lesbell.com.au]
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
