Alan Mead wrote:
>
> I'll defer to Kara. Kara?
>
> If memory serves, someone (maybe it was you) mentioned during the first go
> around that they couldn't contribute items. I checked with Scott Murray and
> there was no such restriction. I think the individual had confused a
> different issue.
>
> I believe you do need to transfer copyright on the items you write to LPI
> and keep them secret, so maybe that knocks out some folks who might have
> existing items that they use for some purpose like training assessment or
> class-room situations.
>
> But this is more a policy issue than I can speak to authoritatively. I can
> say that unless there is some compelling reason why someone cannot
> particpate, I would welcome everyone's help!
>
> -Alan
>
While I don't/can't/won't speak for LPI, I've been somewhat involved in
this. The last time around, anyone could submit questions. That didn't
mean those questions would be used -- many were
dismissed/modified/edited for various reasons. But once submitted, the
items did belong to LPI.
Now, some of us reviewed those questions. We were/are/continue to be
under non-disclosure oaths as to test content. This part of the
process, the actual item review, Les could not be involved in and comply
with the letter and intent of the NDA (unless he's stopped writing
course content for LPI exams). But content submission is not covered by
NDA, it just involves a transfer of rights.
LPI officers, pls correct me it I'm so far out in left field I'm no
longer on terra firma.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
--
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
