> Sometimes the hands-on tests can really "paint you in a corner" if you > don't have enough experience with something. I will never take the RHCE > exam-only again (I got a 96% and passed, but as little as a 93% and you > can still fail because of some sub-section compulsory requirement), you > really need the crash-course. > > But if I need the crash-course, then what does that say for the exam? > > Even if we would all agree that a hands on exam is better, how realistic is it to make that work all over the world? I mean, a form based exam can be done litterally everywhere on earth. For hands on, you need some infrastructure, someone to maintain and so on; it would be far more expensive to do. So is this really the way we want to go, even *if* we would agree that it is a better way of testing?
Sander van Vugt _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
