On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 00:50 -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > That's not the same thing. Most Samba admins have it just to serve > Windows clients. We should target the real world were professionals > live, not the ideal world of perfect technology. And would you setup > Samba on an all-Linux network?
Again, I think such things should be left to a _future_ desktop exam. Unless it goes in the Samba configuration files (like user/group mappings, login scripts, Samba-specific LDAP schema, etc...), I would argue _against_ it. It's going to be rather easy to "throw the kitchen sink in" rather quickly. We want to _avoid_ that. And, as I asked before (and very much hinted last year too), I don't think the initial set of enterprise Linux exams will be taken very seriously if we only focus on Samba when it comes to network filesystems. Not everyone is using Linux for only servers to Windows systems. ;-> -- Bryan P.S. Remember, even Microsoft has a _separate_ desktop certification in the MSDST -- Desktop and Support Technician. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------- The existence of Linux has far more to do with the breakup of AT&T's monopoly than anything Microsoft has ever done. _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
