On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Ray Rashif <schivmeis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 June 2013 14:15, Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> wrote: > > I wanted to survey the LyX and LaTeX community for some opinions on this, > perhaps to get an idea as to the demand for some research into this area. > The project would do some empirical comparisons of the workarounds and > propose at most two or three solutions that work (integration with Pandoc, > or converintg directly to a simpler and well-supported language). > > The emphasis would be on retaining as much semantic meaning as possible, > across different levels of complexity, starting from the very basic. I am > not aware of any similar academic or non-academic effort, but this could > also be a long blog post. > > HI Ray, I am not sure about what you're asking, exactly? Perhaps a survey of the different lyx-doc(x) use cases that current lyx users care most about? Or rather a definition of the simplest yet still useful use case we can imagine? If the former, I would suggest starting a page on our wiki, perhaps as a possible GSoC 2014 project, as a repository of useful cases people could refer to. If the latter...well I'd need further info because I'm not really sure what you're aiming for. Cheers, Stefano -- __________________________________________________ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas A&M University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org