> > > > On the other hand, if you want to implement slave stack also, this board > is good option. Also this is what I am trying to do. > > Since Ethercat is half open, so openPowerlink is better in my opinion. > > -chengxi > >> >>> It's a pity that I'll have little free time in the next 3 to 6 months, but if I had to implement an EtherCAT slave interfaced with Machinekit, I would go with http://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soes/index.html as they showed already that SOES stack works with on Freescale K10 with using Beckhoff ET1100 http://download.rt-labs.com/slavedemo/
Beckhoff ET1100 docs are publicly available as well as the docs of ET1100 substitute EVB-LAN9252-ADD-ON by Microchip. With Mirochip and DE0-Nano the material costs are under 200 Euro. b -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
