On Saturday, June 16, 2001, at 06:19 PM, Harry Zink wrote:
> Yes, that may be so, but to be perfectly fair, a better original focus
> on
> WHAT exactly to provide would have avoided much of this, if the goal had
> been to provide, at a minimum, feature parity with the Windows version
> (which is well-designed browser).
Feature parity is a little vague, but I assume you mean dealing with web
content in equivalent ways. This is actually quite difficult since
things like ActiveX are heavily Win32 dependent (probably by design).
> everyone else has had it working flawlessly, but still) - currently,
> they
> have their hands and feet full just fixing Apple's mess, and making
> their
> product work well with the basic feature set.
That's pretty harsh. Both Apple and Microsoft are working with new
technology. It's challenging.
- Scott
--
Scott Stevenson
http://wildtofu.com/
http://maxify.com/
To unsubscribe send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/macie-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
