We have a "household" license (I wanted to not tie it too strongly to the notion of families) -- up to 4 in the same residence -- for Sandvox; I had done something similar for Watson.
About 1/7th or our "pro" licenses are household licenses. Only a very small fraction (5%) of the regular edition are household licenses. I like the idea of a 'small business pack' but it's already complicated enough, offering two editions (regular vs. pro) and single/household/site-license options! :-) Dan Wood On Jan 12, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Scott Morrison wrote: > I am thinking about revamping my volume license pricing and would like to get > some perspectives. > > Currently I have a standard volume license starting with a 10% discount for 3 > licenses and working upwards in tiers. > > Currently probably 95% of my sales are single licenses and I am wondering if > my volume licensing pricing is too steep and it is encourage people in the > same house/small business to purchase one and share with others. (I don't > have a system which checks for # of licenses in use) > > > I am considering implementing a "Family pack" which would be good for members > of the same household up to 5 people at a price of 2.25 times the single > license price. > > So a few questions: > > How many people use Volume licensing and how many sell "family packs" -- and > what is the pricing scheme for either. > > Does anyone also extend the "family" pack to "small business packs" -- for > organizations <= 5 people. > > If anyone had moved from volume pricing to family packs how did that affect > sales. > > Thanks in advance for any insights/ perspectives > > Scott >
