On 05/06/2014 02:17 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote: > > Fair enough. So, basically I'm fsck'd. Set the lists to be > "anonymous_list" or set an explicit reply-to to be the lists and hope > that strips out the extraneous reply-to entry.
I went back and forth with this. Initially, if first_strip_reply_to was Yes and reply_goes_to_list was This list or Explicit address, I didn't put the poster's address in Reply-To: I finally decided it was of overriding importance to expose the posters address to enable off list (or non-list member) replies, and this warranted breaking the previous Reply-To: header munging options semantics. I am willing to consider changing this, either to treat Reply-To: differently for Wrap Message since the original headers are in the wrapped message in that case, or to just go back to not adding the poster's address to Reply-To: as in my initial paragraph above. However, I need more feedback from the community before making changes. I could always add yet another setting, but I hate that idea for multiple reasons. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
