On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:31 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I am willing to consider changing this, either to treat Reply-To: > differently for Wrap Message since the original headers are in the > wrapped message in that case, or to just go back to not adding the > poster's address to Reply-To: as in my initial paragraph above. > > However, I need more feedback from the community before making changes. > I could always add yet another setting, but I hate that idea for > multiple reasons.
It's ugly, but having yet another switch seems to me to be the only way to handle this. Having the poster's address in Reply-To: is the only way to address the information loss implied by the necessary change to the From: header, especially for MUAs that expose only the address comment and not the actual address, and especially for subscribers who are not technically inclined and wish to simply hit "reply" and get a reply to the original author. This _should_ be a matter of choice for list admins, even if it seems that they're already overloaded with choices pursuant to addressing the DMARC issue. Until something better comes along, we're just going to have to deal with it. -- Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works if you let it" FMP Computer Services | 512-259-1190 | --- The Roadie http://www.fmp.com | ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
