On 5/6/14, 5:31 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I went back and forth with this. Initially, if first_strip_reply_to was > Yes and reply_goes_to_list was This list or Explicit address, I didn't > put the poster's address in Reply-To: > > I finally decided it was of overriding importance to expose the posters > address to enable off list (or non-list member) replies, and this > warranted breaking the previous Reply-To: header munging options semantics. > > I am willing to consider changing this, either to treat Reply-To: > differently for Wrap Message since the original headers are in the > wrapped message in that case, or to just go back to not adding the > poster's address to Reply-To: as in my initial paragraph above. > > However, I need more feedback from the community before making changes. > I could always add yet another setting, but I hate that idea for > multiple reasons. >
Can there be an option somewhere in between "anonymous_list" and "reply_goes_to_list?" One where it can strip the poster's email from the reply-to, but leave the other headers alone? Best, --Glenn ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
