On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Geoff Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Phil, > > I'm inclined to agree with you that the pros and cons should be summarized > neatly rather than forcing people to dig into the mailing list. However, I > don't think it's necessary to recall the current ballot as it stands for a > simple matter such as this one. I just re-read this entire thread, and the > pro and con list is very short. yes, it is only a small amount of things. Shouldnt that be an argument in *favor* for "hey, its easy to fix, so lets do it quickly and move on"? I just want to make sure that the ballot shows the effective work impact of each way. 6 vs 120 packages long time to converge, vs short. (days vs months!) Perhaps a wiki page should be put together for this vote with the pro and > cons of the argument - I certainly don't see the harm in it. Since people > have 6 whole days to vote, there is no reason to cancel the ballot, > especially since people can change their minds up until the end of the > election. > well, this isnt a matter of "cancelling", since the "vote" has not officially started yet. I'd like this to be resolved, and start voting! :) > > Since you are a proponent of providing a summary for ballots, please also > consider providing a summary of your objections at the beginning of a > discussion so that others can see the entirety of your point of view at > once, and perhaps let the small stuff go. Otherwise, it just looks like you > are trying to kill the discussion with a thousand cuts. > > I will certainly try. At the same time, I hope its understandable that I'm not omniscient, so I dont see all possible issues at once myself! :-}
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
