Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]> writes: > 2011/2/15 Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]>: >>> Is there any new input? If no I suggest getting to a vote. >>> (1) CSW*-dev *_dev >>> (2) CSW*-devel *_devel >>> While the current OpenCSW standard is (2) the solution (2) is short leaving >>> more space for package names, is consistent with other packaging projects >>> and without loss of meaning. > > I'm currently setting up the vote on ballotbin. I don't know how much > writeup from my side is expected. On one hand, I feel that the ballot > should contain a reference or a writeup, but on the other hand, if I > start writing it, my writeup will just get criticized and will never > be good enough. I'm inclined to do no writeup whatsoever, and only > include a link to this thread: > > http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-February/014148.html
The writeup is clearly the citation of Dagobert's message. As we discussed this in the referenced thread I think that a vote can go as soon as it is set up, no more discussion is needed. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
