On 2/24/11, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: > Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 2/24/11, Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm inclined to do no writeup whatsoever, and only >>> include a link to this thread: >>> >>> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-February/014148.html >>> >> >> which will ensure that some people will not read it. > > Why do you think so? It's a URI accessible for everybody, isn't it? >... >> Each "side" gets complete control over their part of the writeup. >> There should only be editorial fiddling, if either one side gives >> *factually incorrect* statements, or it is just ludicrously long. (3x >> the length of the other side, or something) > > The message at the head of this thread cites a honest summary that > Dagobert has done. There is nothing wrong with that. Or is it? >
ironically, I think you just proved my point, "people wont read the thread". Because if you had (re?)read the whole thread rather than just the first article, you would already know my viewpoint on Dagobert's summary. Now, speaking of "what's wrong with that?" questions... what's wrong with my proposal about ballot writeups? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
