Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: > On 2/24/11, Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm inclined to do no writeup whatsoever, and only >> include a link to this thread: >> >> http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-February/014148.html >> > > which will ensure that some people will not read it.
Why do you think so? It's a URI accessible for everybody, isn't it? > There is a solution to this; I already proposed it in a thread a while > back, but I'll repeat it. > have one person from "each side", do a part of the writeup. > This is a standard real-world methodology for ballots in some places. > > Each "side" gets complete control over their part of the writeup. > There should only be editorial fiddling, if either one side gives > *factually incorrect* statements, or it is just ludicrously long. (3x > the length of the other side, or something) The message at the head of this thread cites a honest summary that Dagobert has done. There is nothing wrong with that. Or is it? -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
