This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

Santa

Beware...you never know how your footprint may be "transferred". And we don't 
have to prove you were there, just that
your boot COULD make a footprint....and let's leave Donner and the team out of 
it for now....

Look forward to sharing our cookies and milk with you.

Michael
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf 
Of James Enterline
  Sent: Friday, December 25, 2009 9:36 AM
  To: Discussion group for map history
  Subject: Re: [MapHist] Vinland Map - time for a new conference?


  Kenneth Towe is entitled to his own opinion as to the reasonableness of my 
transfer scenario, but I have already
addressed his repeated objections.   Nevertheless, it does work, and we are 
presumably at a standoff unless someone else
tries the experiment.  So I guess we'll have to simply agree to disagree.  His 
challenge to "come up with a PLAUSIBLE
story FIRST for why the Vinland Map has its very peculiar two-line ink" is for 
many participants over probably many
years.

  David Bradbury seems to have something in the works justifying his preference 
of the mid-50's for his putative forger,
and I will look forward to seeing it.  But I can't see the Mellon family 
getting mixed up in anything that might
eventually backfire criminally on their reputation for a measly few hundred 
thousand dollars or less.  Shrewd operators
yes, but risky sponsors of forgery, no.  The same for the scholars at Yale.

  I want to remind everyone that this thread was started by Jacquelin Olin 
proposing a new conference.  There has been
some tentative interest off-line in sponsoring such a conference.  We know from 
these recent exchanges of at least two
(probably three counting Kirsten) eager presenters.  It usually takes a year or 
so to get something like that together.

  Meanwhile, I am entertaining myself with the Rosetta Stone Latin course, 
expecting to apply it to some research on
medieval cryptography in some specific European libraries.

  Until then, Vale!     Jim
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to