This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

Sounds like a worthwhile if sizeable collaborative effort. Perhaps an online 
bibliographic tool like Zotero (a Firefox plugin http://www.zotero.org/), which 
is designed to capture web page metadata,  allows group sharing and enables 
output in a number of convenient formats, would help support individuals 
working on such an venture.


Ian Williams


From: Tony Campbell 
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:19 PM
To: Discussion group for map history 
Subject: [MapHist] A listing of digitised early atlases


This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The reference to the digitised version of the first printed Ptolemy (1477 
rather than 1462):

http://mdz12.bib-bvb.de/~db/ausgaben/uni_ausgabe.html?projekt=1157526886

prompts me to ask if anybody has thought of, or might be interested in, the 
following:  a listing of digitised early atlases.

I have attempted on 'Map History', over the years, to document such efforts, if 
only in general terms, listing the atlas under the relevant region or 'World 
atlases', in the section 'Images of early maps on the web'. 

http://www.maphistory.info/webimages.html

However, the body of such online publications is growing so fast that I am no 
longer keeping up with developments. This would seem to be an opportunity for a 
new initiative to which Map History would happily link.

In the past, particularly with the series of volumes produced by Nico Israel 
(in the Theatrum Orbis Terratrum series), we had library access to a good 
selection of early atlases. We now have access to a much larger image library, 
accessible to all. Even though those digitised volumes are rarely provided with 
much commentary, and certainly not of the quality of the earlier printed 
volumes, they still represent a very valuable, and fast growing, resource. When 
the images are enlargeable to more than original size and at high resolution, 
and when such images can be compared side-by-side on a home or library 
computer, they represent a vital research tool.

But do any of us know what is out there?  Could most of us find an individual 
title, let alone an organised browsing list that served as an online index to 
all those unconnected efforts?  Theoretically, it is all available to us (since 
nearly all such sites have free access). In practice, without tailored 
finding-aids, much of it must be missed by the scholars who could have 
benefitted.

How many works of cartographic interest can be found among the Bavarian State 
Library's 4,200 titles?  How could you find them?

Such an index might be of value also to those institutions contemplating fresh 
digitisation. Would it not be better, when a selection of works was being made, 
to concentrate on those that had not been scanned already by others?

If anybody thinks this an interesting project, I would be happy to offer any 
advice - if that was wanted.

Tony Campbell

[email protected]


 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to