> "Normal" in the sense of orthogonal or perpendicular; that is, having > independent semantics along the "axes". Basically, I mean loosely coupled > with the method extensions. > > Indeed, I think authfailure-report can be written without mentioning neither > "dkim" nor "spf", except for possible examples. I guess that would enhance > comprehensibility. However, the WG should decide whether to go this way > _before_ delving into any finer tuning, if it's not too late already.
The problem right now is that each arf message generated due to auth failures are formatted differently and it makes automation very difficult - if we don't tie the authfailure messages minimally to dkim and spf - I don't think we have accomplished anything - at the very least I think they should be the minimum with the option to extend for future. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
