On 05/Jul/11 20:48, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Ignoring redaction for the moment, what we have now is: > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP > - spf-reporting modifies SPF > > That seems nice and clean. Your proposal changes it to: > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP, and also modifies authfailure-report > - spf-reporting modifies SPF, and also modifies authfailure-report > > At a glance the first method seems cleaner to me. On the other > hand, the latter is a more clear demonstration of how future email > authentication methods will need to create reporting hooks.
A more realistic advantage of the second method is to allow editing, say, dkim-reporting without having to negotiate dkim-related modifications with a given version of authfailure-report. > What do others think? And let's try to make this the last revisit > of the arrangement of this work so that we can make some progress. +1 _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
