Very good texts! As ermouth already mentioned: Fauxton and Website are OK, the others are a bit too long (I tried out and put the texts in the cards)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:05 PM, ermouth <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Here’s one: https://gist.github.com/nolanlawson/09cab7798aed9ec9044c >> Any thoughts? > > Good, but too long – we need less adjectives. > > Fauxton and Website are ok, all others definitely do not fit. > > ermouth
