********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

"If you know of forms of racism that are "tolerated" by the left, then why
the hell aren't you fighting THAT racism? Can't you speak up when you see
such injustice, AS THE REST OF US TRY TO? "

That is literally all I have been doing. That is what half of my posts on
this list-serv that you have turned into a cesspool through posts like this
have been about.

You posted the same clipped text, so the only purpose of this new topic is
for you to (yet again) falsely insinuate that my comments about racism are
a guise for normalizing anti-Semitism. Jeff, you are once again *proving my
point*. The original, taken from my criticism of self-declared Zionist
Sheldon Ranz, is here:

" *Specifically, this: http://socialistcurrents.org/?p=2914

^^^Outside of the obvious racism that underpins comments like:

 "Demand #3 [The right of Palestinians to return to their lands] appears to
be the “tricky one”, since, on first glance, it plays into fears that it
mandates Israel allowing a flood of Palestinian refugees that would turn
Israel’s Jewish majority into a minority. *Not only is this highly
unlikely, since Jews have not flooded Israel under the Jewish Law of
Return, but the demand’s wording only deals with the principle of the Right
of Return and does not concern itself with its actual implementation.*"

There is also the obvious thread that runs through Sheldon's entire
worldview about Zionism in that he attempts to make it compatible with
liberalism and democracy. It is a racist whitewash and would explain why
Sheldon Ranz thinks Tony Greenstein is anti-Semitic for using the prefix
"Zio" which means "Zionist". That is not being "part" of the BDS Movement,
that is co-opting it with bigotry against the very people he claims to be
defending. Gross.

That is putting aside all of the other bizarre and straightforwardly racist
comments he has made in prior discussions.

*Ironically, Sheldon proves the point I made earlier in this thread:
that anti-Semitism is treated exceptionally on the left while other forms
of racism are tolerated, and much if not all of the fuss is itself rooted
in anti-Arab bigotry that Sheldon Ranz embodies with his unwelcome
"support". *


Jeff is trolling in defense of Sheldon Ranz and his whitewashing of
Zionism. The point shouldn't even need to be labored this much, so Jeff is
apparently doing the kind of thing that nitpicky prosecutors do: purposely
removing quotes from context to cast suspicion on defendants. Sheldon (and
now Jeff) are literal proof that the exaggerated claims of "left
anti-Semitism" are designed to validate other forms of racism. Jeff is
literally doing that in this very thread that he began by taking my
comments about Sheldon Ranz blatantly racist statements about Zionism out
of context. Then he asks why I haven't condemned those racist statements
when they're literally the only things I've posted about. ???

This is trolling.

Amith R. Gupta



On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jeff via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

> ********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *****************************************************************
>
> On 2018-03-29 18:29, A.R. G via Marxism wrote:
>
>>
>> Are you joking? Jeff, the only person that wrote that was you.
>>
>
> No, I'm not joking, and you conveniently clipped the original exchange
> from your reply. So I'll restore it. I was responding to what YOU had
> written:
>
> On 2018-03-29 15:04, A.R. G via Marxism wrote:
>
>> anti-Semitism is treated exceptionally on the left while other forms of
>> racism are tolerated
>>
>
> So I'll put it a different way: If you know of forms of racism that are
> "tolerated" by the left, then why the hell aren't you fighting THAT racism?
> Too busy? Well then just start by telling the rest of us what we have been
> "tolerating" for so long (because we're supposedly too busy fighting
> antisemitism") and DEMAND that we stop our treachery! Can't you speak up
> when you see such injustice, AS THE REST OF US TRY TO?
>
> Or is this just an attempt to normalize racism?
>
> - Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  I never
>
>> suggested that anti-Semitism be tolerated, only that the inequality of
>> "tolerance" indicates that the obsession with anti-Semitism (including
>> yours) is itself a sign of inequality (by definition). So if you are going
>> to accuse me of tolerating anti-Semitism you should not be able to
>> fabricate quotes in this manner.
>>
>> Amith R. Gupta
>>
> _________________________________________________________
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/opt
> ions/marxism/amithrgupta%40gmail.com
>
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to