On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:24 AM, <gi1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 12:42:52AM -0400, David Morris wrote: > >> I would be among those opposed to seeing mrxvt tied to a big toolkit >> like GTK unless it were an optional component (e.g. mrxvt-gtk as a >> separate build configuration). > > I'm certainly for this! I don't use menus in mrxvt, and don't plan to in > the foreseeable future. I'd be OK deleting it entirely, or moving it to > gtk, or improving it (e.g. allow sticky menus), or leaving it as is :) > > If we just move the menus to gtk, we can certainly make them optional at > compile time.
I am missing something here. Is there a problem with menus how they are handled now? I usually don't use menus so have not paid attention to them yet. David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Materm-devel mailing list Materm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net
