Hash: SHA1

Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Well,
> As I see there are plenty of people who would like to work further on mc, it 
> would be very sad if these people will work on different versions, as this is 
> ineffective, and tend to end in even more dead projects. 

Yes, this may be a trouble. We have already realized it and in the
future will try to communicate in English.

> My suggestion would be to have at first a look who wants to help to develop 
> mc 
> further and then where to do this. 
> Personally I would like to make a viewable break to the development which was 
> done until now, this mean: a new repository (not longer the CVS (as CVS is 
> ancient in my eyes and svn or git is much better). 

In now, we use svn (what we well known), but I like the distributed
VCS's more. If there an easy migration way from svn to git then this
opportunity will be considered. And with the wishes of the people who
are interested in further development of the project - a decision would
not been taken only of a developers team.

> So: At first the people who would like to work on mc should send a: "I would 
> like to do something".

Yes, we like. We would like further improvement and development of
Midnight Commander.

WBR, Slavaz

Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Mc-devel mailing list

Reply via email to