2010/7/9 Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>: > On 7/9/2010 10:35 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > it would suite you if you would use your corporate email address in public > rather than an anonymous gmail one.
(Ignoring the case at hand, forking the thread) I personally don't see any reason why he would have to. An earth-near explanation can be that he signed up for these lists before knowing involvement at day zero, through the meego.com web interface when signing up for an account and to his gmail to follow the activity. meego-packaging subscriptions was added using our OBS accounts, which most likely, have our corporate emails. This is MeeGo. Your company affiliation does not make your opinions more or less valid or invalid. We have a problem if we think like this. If you (Arjan) were writing using a @moocows.com e-mail, having the merit you have and the position as Chief Architect, your domain name does not affect the validity of your opinions. They're as is. Frankly, it would all be easier if contributors with a role/commit bit of MeeGo had a [email protected] mail address to drive this point through. I personally write using @maemo.org as that is part of the role I have. It is actually through a gmail.com interface. Does this make my mails less valid when I am using my real name? don't think so. I have to stand for my opinions no matter what - I can participate professionally and privately as it shouldn't matter here. My role and merit should be what matters. What should count is my merit, position and the validity of my opinions or ideas. If I'm wrong in my opinions, it would be obvious by feedback and replies counter-arguing my views. Best regards, Carsten Munk maemo.org distmaster, N900 hardware adaptation team member _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
