On Friday 9. July 2010 21.35.51 Carsten Munk wrote: > Corporate emails (as said truthfully by Dawn) increases transparency > and vested interest in the project.
While I can't disagree, the problem with corporate emails is usually the
corporate email server. I don't know about others, but @nokia.com is handled
by a non-Open Source groupware solution which doesn't have an easy way of
configuring filtering rules.
And it is also known for corrupting OpenPGP/MIME emails (bug reported and,
after explaining half a dozen times that it wasn't a client issue, the report
was closed).
One solution I can suggest (to me even) is to subscribe both the corporate
email address and the mailing-list-friendly account. Then you disable delivery
of emails to the corporate account and configure the email client to use the
corporate identity when replying to the ML. That way it will look like you're
using your corporate email :-)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
