On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:14:16 -0600, Felipe Contreras > <[email protected]> wrote: >> And BTW, LKML doesn't require any "company disclosure". > > Why do you keep coming back to "requiring"? No one said they did. No one > proposed that MeeGo does.
Sorry, it's no about what you said, it's the tone of a personal mail from Arjan van de Ven I got. > I give up. > > Enjoy sending email from any address you chose. Enjoy pretending you > don't work for Nokia and you don't get paid for working on MeeGo. I have > no problem with that and no one proposes to establish any rulse against > that. > > I apologize for trying to explain something that clearly has > only served to confuse you. Forget everything I said. I work for Nokia, and I am paid to work on MeeGo, I'm not pretending I'm not. But I subscribed on meego-dev out of *personal* interest, before Nokia appointed any MeeGo tasks to me. And all the mails I've sent are about *personal* interests, Nokia doesn't really care about that. If I wasn't working for Nokia, the mails would have been exactly the same (maybe slightly delayed until build.meego.com is opened to the community). Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
