Derek Franklin wrote;
> Oops, thanks for pointing that out - my bad. Basically, the early 180B
> strut with the small stub axle looks for all the world identical to the
> 1600 one. It uses smaller wheel bearings and a smaller castellated nut to
> secure the hub to the strut. The stub axle on the later 180B strut is much
> larger and obviously uses larger bearings and so forth.
> Also, the flange the wheel mounts up to on the hub is round on the later
> struts that you need for those conversions, whereas the early hubs and 1600
> ones have cutaways between the wheel studs on the outer circumference of
> the flange ( whew ! ).
> That's a fine solution to the offset adjustment too - well done.
>
> DF
>
>
Derek,
Do you know the production year that the better 180B strut comes from? I've
also heard these may have better camber geometry too. Is this true?
--
Regards,
Andrew
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.datascribe.com.au/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.datascribe.com.au/ozdatonline/listindex.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
