very true the law seems to be open to interpretation too much and as such 
sum police officer or rego guy with a chip on his shoulder can basically 
make the biggest c@nt of themselves possible, as has been said before 
modifications should take into account the individual not a group. If i was 
to install a fj properly and upgrade the brakes properly etc id still be no 
better off in their eyes to sumone who just welded the damn thing to sum 
bodgy engine mounts until i pay big dollars to get it engineered. WA laws 
seem to be a fair bit different to u guys at least we can drive sum left 
hand drive cars unchanged. But yeah i was thinking a larger master cylinder 
would make the pedal feel sloppy as they have been saying on the list and as 
uve identitified a 3/4 m/cylinder feels the best so far for me. Id say as 
long as it is working fine and u dont have any need to change it then at 
least try ot for a bit as for boosters will i be required by law to run one 
or is there a way i can keep my 3/4 master cylinder there until it comes 
time for engineering also terry would u be able to email me directly 
concerning the r31 rear disc swap [EMAIL PROTECTED] cheers mate :)

>From: Terry & Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Ozdat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Fw: Crappy brakes
>Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 11:04:32 +1000 (EST)
>
>FJ MAN,
>
>Upgrading to the larger brake master cylinder on a 510 I think
>this could be where everyone that has "crappy brake pedal" is
>going wrong. If we want a good feel and the correct travel in the
>pedal which go hand in hand there absolutely no good reason to put
>a larger master cylinder on a 510 than is required to be
>effective. When you go to dual circuit & 200B/240K or whatever
>upgrade for the FJ, i recommend you still use the 610 SSS Nabco or
>Tokico 3/4" m/cyl & small bendix booster etc. and then connect the
>remote fittings off the Urvan and ditch the 2 removable reservoirs
>off the 180B m/cyl (it's very easy to do) - i.e. you don't use the
>Urvan cylinders. BTW Same deal for the clutch so you need a clutch
>m/cyl which has the removable reservoir. (Nabco, Tokico or Sankyo)
>
>As you are using a L18 my comment about the stock single circuit
>brakes still stands, under the national guidelines if you did an
>L18 upgrade today, most rego places would require a dual cylinder
>fitted. That has been the case in the ACT for a very long time,
>but funnily enough the owner who did the right thing and notified
>of the engine upgrade was the only one subject to that
>requirement. The law is an ass someone said - too true.
>
>regards,
>
>--
>Terry
>
>Forwarded Message:
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: "FJ MAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Crappy brakes
> > Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 16:24:32 GMT
> > -----
> > i havent upgraded to the fj yet just the email account so far
>still old
> > lseries power haha ive got a slightly worked L18 so the brake
>feel very good
> > really good feed bak but  i will be using remote reservoirs and
>a larger
> > m/cyl off a 240k or urvan setup i think it is commercial is
>better i am told
> >
> >
> > >From: Terry & Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: Fw: Crappy brakes
> > >Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 02:14:26 +1000
> > >
> > >Stock is a 3/4" and that's why it feels good. The only reason
>to go for a
> > >dual
> > >is safety, i'm surprised your rego dudes haven't asked you to
>upgrade once
> > >you
> > >fitted an engine bigger than stock.
> > >
> > >terry
> > >
> > >FJ MAN wrote:
> > >
>
><big snip>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.datascribe.com.au/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.datascribe.com.au/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to