Andrew,
Yep, to the best of my knowledge that's it.
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew
Greenbury
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 2:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 1600 IRS (was 200B SSS)
terry
so no geometry changes/pickup point differences etc with the IRS
over the years? just slight SSS A arm differences?
thanks
andrew
From: "Terry Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Tue, 1 May 2001 14:08:05 +1000
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 1600 IRS (was 200B SSS)
> Andrew,
>
> No real differences as such that I know of in the 1600. The SSS A arms are
a
> bit different as I had a bit of grief fitting my R31 disks i.e. welds are
in
> a different place to standard. I recall that the Part Numbers for the SSS
> are slightly different for some other components in the rear too, can't
> recall what exactly but it's only minor stuff like bushes etc.
>
> regards
> Terry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew
> Greenbury
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 11:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 1600 IRS (was 200B SSS)
>
>
> hi all
>
> this talk of the various rear suspensions for different 200B models,
> and the fact early versus later 1600s have slightly different front
> ends has me wondering if there are such differences in the 1600
> rear suspension? ie were there slight differences in the 1600 IRS
> setup over the years, in the same way as the front end??
>
> andrew
>
>
--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
