Ohh P.S Stock 240K spring are heavier duty as the extra weight of the 6 cylinder engine warrants for it. So 1600 ones should drop the front down a bit so the 1.5 inch ones should drop it a little further. Later. Rick White.
--- "Chris Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Listers, > >Ive just installed 240K Struts and brakes and my car now looks like a rally >car at the front, not the idle look when the back is nice and low! But >anyway what i want to know is do the std 1600 springs bring the height back >down to how it should be? > >Looking through the history i have been able to get it down to this. > >"You can use 1600 springs with 240K struts as they're the same diameter. >It's very unlikely that they will vary the suspension height much as a >stock >height 1600 spring for 70+ struts are fairly short in comparison to 240K >springs. " Terry Rudd > >Is any one able to tell me how much shorter the 1600 springs are? and >IMPORTANTLY will they remain captive in the 240K struts? THis car has to >go over the pits and as such they must be captive. > >I only have a set of lowered Laser springs that were in the 1600 struts >that were in the car, other wise i'd just try it. > >Thanks > >Chris S > _____________________________________________________________ Get Your free Ozdat Email Account ---> http://www.ozdat.com _____________________________________________________________ Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with [EMAIL PROTECTED] by Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
