My FJ has a gasket around the edge of the cover and a gasket agound the plug holes. Oh and half moon seals as well. 4 of them..
On 4/4/05 1:27 PM, "Mohit K. Autar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > i just wanted to know something about fj20 engine.a friend of mine who was in > nz last week and he went to a spare parts shop to buy a valve cover gasket for > the fj20 eng. > > the salesman asked him if it was a one piece or two piece gasket.well he didnt > knew anything about it so he didnt buy it. > > can anyone explain that to me pliz.as i will be needing a valve cover gasket > soon. > > > Mohit. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 2:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? > > > found some interesting dyno results - at wheels i assume. > > http://www.datsuns.com/Tech/datsundyno.htm > > > cheers Jeff. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Errol Smith > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? > > > The polar moment of inertia is the main problem, also to a lesser extent > is the change in weight distribution. > Single cam VG30's are definitely a better proposition although expensive > to set up. > Cheers > Feral Errol > www.datrats.com.au > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? > > > The concern i guess is the amount of engine in front of the struts > affecting cornering. i put this to the ozdat forum & the concensus was > that i was mad for suggesting it :) i reckon in the end the best 6 > cylinder would be the vg30. i think that it is legal in NA form, just > within the weight ratio? has anyone had any experience with the vg30 > swap ? from what i have seen it is probably just as expensive as a sr20 > etc. i thought the L series 6 transplant might be quite cheap to do, but > have no idea how bad the weight distribution would affect the corner > ability of the vehicle. I found a guy (Eddie) who has seen that orange > stanza, he reckons the radiator is under that aluminiun cover that you > can see in the photo. I still like the idea of the L20 or L28 in the > 1600 & i think it would be comparatively cheap to do, ie no special > requirements for fuel injection etc etc, just stick triples on it. the > handling has me concerned though, any ideas ?........anyway enough > rambling for now. > > cheers Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: L18 stroker - any good? > > > An L28 would fit if you moved the radiator to the rear. But it would be > pretty front heavy. > > I know there is a 200B rally car in Vic with an L24 engine in it. Looks > a pretty good fit. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:01 AM > Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? > > >> OUCH ! >> does an L20 6 cylinder fit in a 510 without fire wall modifications ? >> anybody know ? >> >> ta Jeff. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Errol Smith >> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:45 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? >> >> >> Jeff, >> An S20 would be around $40,000. They come up on Yahoo japan >> occasionally for 3.5M Yen. >> >> Cheers >> Feral Errol >> www.datrats.com.au >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff >> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:43 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? >> >> >> I suppose that the L20 or S20 6 cylinder engine from early skylines is > >> too long to fit in a 510 ? they would make some nice torque for hill >> climbs, even in NA form. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Denzil >> Palmer >> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:32 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: L18 stroker - any good? >> >> >> That would give 1,863cc with a 4mm stroke - not bad! >> >> ---------- >>> From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: RE: L18 stroker - any good? >>> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:07 PM >>> >> >>> Denzil, >>> >>> you can also use L18 crank, rods & pistons plus a .080 inch overbore > >>> to >> make >>> your L16 into an L18 >>> >>> Jeff. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of rclough >>> Sent: Saturday, 19 March 2005 5:54 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: L18 stroker - any good? >>> >>> >>> Denzil >>> You can get an L18W block (japanese built) bored out to 89mm and get > >>> close to 2 litres without stroking. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Denzil Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:26 PM >>> Subject: L18 stroker - any good? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Anyone here built an L18 stroked? Is it worth doing compared to an >>>> L20B? >> I >>>> know that it will be about 50lbs lighter based on engine weights >>>> that >> have >>>> been posted a while ago here. That alone interests me. >>>> >>>> It looks like around 1940cc is possible with a +.060 overbore and >>>> 5mm >> >>>> stroke. Would a Japan L18 block take this OK? Would the crank be >>>> welded >> up >>>> for this and reground. What piston specs are required. >>>> >>>> I'm not looking to save money going this way, BTW. The concept >>>> interests >>> me >>>> as a replacement engine for an L16 for road use without going the >>>> L20B route, that's all. >>>> >>>> Looking at some old posts I see Brad Hallett was doing one. >>>> >>>> Denzil Palmer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: >>>> 30/03/2005 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: >>>> 30/03/2005 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: >>> 30/03/2005 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: >>> 30/03/2005 >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/05 >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/05 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: >>> 30/03/2005 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. >>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: >>> 30/03/2005 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/2005 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/2005 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/2005 >> >> --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- >> OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- >> Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send >> submissions to [email protected] No unauthorised >> redistribution of this email >> http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm >> http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 30/03/2005 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005 >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005 >> > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005 > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005 > > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 1/04/2005 --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [email protected] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 1/04/2005
