Whether that was the actual goal or simply an unintended consequence, the
fact remains that the net effect of recent economic policy is the gradual
destruction of the middle class.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Gary
> Hurst
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 3:04 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] (no subject)
> 
> i think it was an effort to destabilize the middle class.  in my old
> neighborhood, rather than that help the homeowners stay in their homes ,
> they sent the sheriff for the homeowners, paid the banks the full not plus
> 10% and turned around and sold th houses for 1/3 what they bought them
> for.  explain to me what else that is an attempt to do?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Scott Ritchey <ritche...@nc.rr.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > This is significant, particularly when you recall that the crash of
> > 2008/2009 was purely a banking crisis.  Sure, lots of folks bought
> houses
> > they couldn't afford (only after banks made foolish loans with
> > Freddie/Fanny
> > cheerleading all the way).  But the taxpayer didn't bail out those
> > homeowners, taxpayers bailed out the banks and a few businesses (like
> GM)
> > that were more bank than automaker.  Domestically, it may not make much
> > difference immediately because dollars (no matter how many are
> printed)are
> > still legal tender. But when dollars become worth less internationally,
> the
> > cost of imported things (like petro and all consumer goods) will
> skyrocket.
> > That, in turn, will ignite domestic inflation.  Even if the US develops
> > gobs
> > of domestic energy, it will be exported.
> >
> > I like my lead with copper jackets.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----



_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to