Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On 11/2/06, Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On 11/2/06, Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>>>> OK, the first round of work on the VBO branch seems to have gone quite
>>>>> smoothly.  It'd be great if a couple of the key r200/r300 people could
>>>>> check the branch out and verify whether I've broken those drivers or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> It'd be particularly interesting to see if someone (Aapo?) can take a
>>>>> look at the disabled vtxfmt_a code and see if it is easy to port that
>>>>> over to the new archiecture.  I've got a feeling it should be fairly
>>>>> straight-forward, as it's simple to fallback to the tnl/ module for any
>>>>> unexpected or non-handled situations.
>>>> I took a quick look at this and it seems doable.  I sketched out a
>>>> simplified approach that just attempts to hook the existing code into a
>>>> _radeon_draw_prims() callback.  It looks like it might work, but it
>>>> would be better to try for a deeper integration.
>>>>
>>>> I'm pretty bullish about the vbo code & would like to see an early
>>>> merge, so please take a look at this.
>>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I investigated recently a bug (8348) and we don't check if in
>>> DrawRangeElement max - min won't requiert a memory area
>>> bigger than what we can have with DMA (which if i am right
>>> can't be bigger than RADEON_BUFFER_SIZE * 16). Do you see
>>> any easy they to work around this. I will try to test VBO branch
>>> today and complete your change.
>> OK.  I've got a couple of bugs to fix yet, and I've still got to try
>> running glean, etc, so it'll be a couple of days before anything
>> happens.  But it would be good to have the r200/r300 drivers up to speed
>> prior to a merge.
>>
>> Keith
>>
> 
> I have tried to play a bit with that but i segfault in vbo_exec_array.c line 
> 127
> with varray in progs/redbook know bug or something from my side ?
> 
> Btw i have thinked a bit more about the need to update max-min vertices
> in drawelements and drawrangeelements and i don't see an easy way to
> split the rendering as we have to go throught all indices and make sure
> that (max-min)*primsize never need more memory than what dma alloc
> can give us. Don't you have similar problem with intel ?

I've fixed the initial problem, but hit another one related to the above 
-- namely that the tnl/ module currently *does* have size limits...

I'd like to lift those limits by just reallocating memory as required, 
but it may be more cache friendly to chop large render requests into chunks.

Keith

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to