On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Roland Scheidegger wrote:

> malc wrote:
>> On an unrelated subject, i don't quite know what to make out of PBO
>> support in R200 drivers, so far all the tests i have performed didn't
>> indicate that PBO is a win for either of the texture formats. Is this
>> really the case?
>> 
>> I'm wondering because on my other machine with NV15 and binary nvidias
>> drivers PBO does make a world of a difference for GL_RGBA8/GL_BGRA.
> The r200 driver doesn't support ARB_pbo. This needs the texmem / ttm work 
> Thomas has commited recently, but the only (open source) dri driver currently 
> supporting it is i915. There's a whole bunch of stuff which would get faster 
> a lot when the driver is adapted (like CopyTexSubImage which is really needed 
> for doom3:roe).

Aha. It would be interesting to see how things turn out when/if the
support will be added for r200, my particular case is basically all
about the speed of sub image (although tex not copytex).

--
vale

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to