-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#review19809
-----------------------------------------------------------


Can you add the relevant TODOs to use /proc for more reliable os::alive 
checking on linux?


third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/os.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#comment40858>

    2 can be verified, but not 1? Is that why this function does not check 
these?



third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/os.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#comment40859>

    s/Try<bool>::error/Error/
    
    Be sure to include <stout/error.hpp>



third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/proc.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#comment40856>

    You can make a TODO for me here, as I'm currently working on this :)
    
    Also, it will be for /proc utilities, not for process utilities.


- Ben Mahler


On April 26, 2013, 7:51 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 26, 2013, 7:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp bd3dcef07c370ad338b478755bf8f7ce6408e4a3 
>   third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/os.hpp 
> 4d51693504f15236c131600737d0b6ddb6a1a819 
>   third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/proc.hpp 
> 19000eb182cef4ecbf10fc3aa6c6e6c076f1ac46 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> N/A
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to