----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#review19682 -----------------------------------------------------------
third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/proc.hpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#comment40632> Since it doesn't check for termination but rather validity (including dead/zombie processes) of a PID, we should probably call it valid instead of alive to avoid confusion, right? - Jiang Yan Xu On April 24, 2013, 12:31 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 24, 2013, 12:31 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler. > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/proc.hpp > 19000eb182cef4ecbf10fc3aa6c6e6c076f1ac46 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > N/A > > > Thanks, > > Jiang Yan Xu > >
