Darren, I have no idea who you are but from your posts I thought you of all people might know the difference between a meteorite classification and the study of a meteorites Cosmochemistry. Obviously you don't. Maybe you should try a Google search before you Try to make other people look stupid. The joke may be on you Mr. know-it-all.... Do you think I make this stuff up for your amusement? I know your not singling me out. You insult everybody. I do notice that none of your snide remarks ever do offer the list any thing of any significant value. You just remind me of a bully. that's all. .
---- Darren Garrison <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:47:04 -0700, you wrote: > > >This material has been shown to have a very odd > >cosmochemistry. So much so that scientists are > >unwilling to publish the results. > > http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/metbull.php?code=45817 > > Okay, some of you on the list have close ties with real meteorite scientists-- > some of you ARE real meteorite scientists. Do any of you know anything about > Carancas being anything other than the H4-4 ordinary chondrite that it is > published to be? Anyone have "very odd cosmochemistry" results that you are > unwilling to publish? (Whisper in our ear, we won't tell anyone.) > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
